POPULAR LADIES MAGAZINE EULOGIZES DOCTOR FOR EXECUTING 1,000
ABORTIONS A YEAR

In the current politically correct climate in which the mainstream media
thrive,
Canadians have conditioned themselves to expect silly statements, even
outrageous ones. The sexual revolution initiated in the 60s and the demise
of
traditional societal standards - which led to the disastrous moral
consequences
evident in society today - are arguably the main reasons we have ceased to
react
appropriately to the secular evangelism of mainstream magazine journalists.

Some of their material, however, occasionally proves simply too offensive
and
one simply must react. Chatelaine Magazine, one of Canada`s leading ladies
magazine is just one such case in point. It boggles the mind to see this
reputed
publication attempt to glorify an undercover abortionist at a Catholic
hospital as
an "Angel of Choice."

The facts presented in a feature article reveal a deceitful abortionist
whose claim
to be pro-choice is mocked by his own admissions. In describing one of his
many cases of late-term abortions on a 17- year-old mother, this "hero" Dr.
'G'
proves himself a liar. He reveals that he arrived late to commit the girl's
abortion
and that she had laminaria insertion (procedure to induce dilation of the
cervix)
already but had decided not to go ahead with the procedure. This "angel of
choice," who claims that abortion remains a pregnant woman`s decision,
proceeded nevertheless to change her mind despite her protests.

Dr. 'G' admits he hides the products of his abortions from attending nurses.
"I
don't like to expose them to this, well, carnage, if you like... It's just -
well, it's
quite disgusting, there's no question about it."

Here is a man Chatelaine eulogizes for executing 1,000 abortions a year
(twice
the number of babies he delivers), who admits participating in carnage. For
whatever reason, the practice of abortion seems especially attractive to the
kinds
of degenerates who, like Dr. 'G', see nothing wrong - as the magazine puts
it -
with the "grisly procedure of physically cutting apart the fetus inside the
womb
and suctioning out the pieces, while keeping watch to make sure all body
parts"
[read: tiny arms, legs, head, thorax, etc.] "are present."

Not surprising really for, with virtually no exceptions, abortionists are
the losers,
rejects, and washouts of the medical community who couldn`t compete in, or
were drummed out of, legitimate medicine. Over and over, there is
irrefutable
proof that good physicians don`t ascend into the practice of abortion, but
instead
bad ones descent into it. The reality is, whether you are talking about
moral
character or technical proficiency, elective abortion is just not done by
the "best
and brightest" of the medical community, and it never will be.

Ten years ago they were saying that abortion on demand should be legalized
so
it could be performed by doctors in a controlled and regulated environment.
But
having discovered that cleaning up their industry would destroy it, those
same
people now viciously oppose even the most benign attempts to control or
regulate abortions, and are even calling for legislation that would allow
non-
physicians to perform them.

Abortion clinics are still the medical community`s "red-light district" and
the
legitimate, competent physicians are still not interested. The abortion
industry
needs to acknowledge that it is not being destroyed by any pro-life success
but
by one of their own failures. Despite their virtual strangle hold on the
media, it has
been unable to make abortion socially acceptable. Instead, abortion remains
a
bone that`s stuck in the throat of the Canadian people. They may not know
what
to do about it, but they know for certain that they can`t swallow it.

There are two fundamental and unchangeable truths about the abortion
procedure itself. First, because the women involved are vulnerable and
often
unconscious, abortion demands practitioners of the highest moral character.
And
second, although abortion is a relatively simple procedure, the fact that it
is
carried out in a part of the body that is very unforgiving of sloppy work
demands
that it be done by practitioners with the highest degree of technical skill.
It is
obvious Dr. 'G' and all of his abortionist colleagues don`t possess either
of those
important requirements..

Radical feminists who dominate magazines such as Chatelaine profess to care
for women, but refuse to accept the fact amply documented by former high
profile
abortionists and abortion clinic operators that abortion clinics have become
the
new backwater of North American medicine, populated by shady operators who
favour high-volume business over the well-being of their vulnerable, often
frightened patients. These people have candidly confessed that slaughtering
unborn babies seems to have burned a hole in their souls, out of which has
seeped away those qualities that enable them to be fully human.

Abortion, which like euthanasia seems to attract the bottom feeders, the
marginal
doctors whom nobody respects, will eventually disappear when all
abortionists
are recognized for demonstrating a depraved indifference to human life, and
physicians are prevented from harming any of their patients, including the
ones
just waiting to be born. Let`s pray fervently to Jesus and His Holy Mother
to
hasten this blessed day.

Thaddée Renault
Fredericton, New Brunswick


Return to the Unborn Children's Website

Return to Council #9496