#72
IN VITRO FERTILIZATION: SURPLUS BABIES IN CONCENTRATION CANS
In vitro fertilization consists of fertilizing human eggs outside the womb
after which a fraction of the resulting embryos are placed in the womb. Most
IVF babies who are placed inside a woman die before implantation or birth, but
an even greater proportion are not even given this small chance of life. The
majority of IVF babies die either in the petrie dish, or during the freezing
and thawing procedures if they are stored, or in the course of destructive
"health"-driven experimentation.
The cold statistics from the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta indicate
that, in 1999, some 21,501 children were born in the U.S. using in vitro
fertility treatments and other similar assisted reproductive techniques. In
order to achieve the 21,501 births, 86,822 assisted reproductive technique
cycles were used with on average 3 to 4 embryos transferred per cycle - or
about 304,000 in total. That`s an excess of some 285,000 human beings, now
considered disposable! Undoubtedly, with the ever increasing popularity of
assisted human reproduction methods like IVF, the 2002-03 figures would be
significantly higher than those shown here.
The IVF process almost always involves the freezing of 'extra' embryos which
may (and often are) then be used in destructive medical research. IVF has
resulted in the deaths of countless live human embryos, as they are
artificially created, screened, implanted, frozen and used for
experimentation. It is in fact estimated that 1 million born babies have been
conceived worldwide through IVF since Louise Brown, the first test-tube baby,
was born in 1978 after being carried, as an embyro, inside a rabbit before
insertion into her mother's womb.
The IVF process, notwithstanding its current popularity with women who
desperately want to give birth (think of Céline Dion), is not without its
inherent dangers. Here in Canada the Royal Commission on Reproductive
Technology found that the industry is not informing women of the technology`s
health risks. For instance, women undergoing IVF are generally exposed to
drugs used to stimulate the ovaries to produce eggs. The drug regimen can
create a condition known as 'Ovarian Hyper-Stimulation Syndrome' (OHSS), in
which the ovaries swell to an enormous size and fluid leaks from the blood
system into body cavities...triggering a stroke. Medical reports show mild
OHSS in 23% of IVF and severe OHSS in 10% of the cases. Additional
consequences to women from the drugs used in IVF are ovarian cysts and the
possibility of developing cancer.
The British medical journal The Lancet and another reliable source reported
just last January (1) that a rare form of eye cancer - retinoblastoma - is
about six times as likely to occur among children who were conceived
artificially; and (2) IVF children were at about five times greater risk of
the rare genetic Beckwith-Wiedermann syndrome, causing excessive growth and
increased cancer risk. Someone ought to tell women seeking IVF treatment that
no matter what precautions they take, and no matter how much money they spend,
they can only fool Mother Nature some of the time.
A team of Australian medical researchers recently published a paper (entitled,
The Risk of Major Birth Defects after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and in
Vitro Fertilization) reporting results of their investigations on births,
births after assisted conception, and major birth defects in infants born
between 1993 and 1997. The study revealed that 75 of the 837 infants conceived
with in vitro fertilization (9.0 percent) had a major birth defect diagnosed
by one year of age, as compared with 168 of the 4000 naturally conceived
infants (4.2 percent). In other words, it found that in vitro fertilization
has twice as high a risk of a major birth defect as naturally conceived
infants.
For too long, the reproductive technology industry has experimented on women`s
bodies, showing a cavalier attitude to short- and long-term effects on women`s
health. IVF is not empowering women but exploiting them as living laboratories
for the benefit of researchers. And women continue to suffer untold and
unknown side effects from IVF and immense psychological trauma, especially in
the usual case of failure to deliver a live baby.
No civilized society should allow some children to be killed because they do
not fit a pre-conceived ideal or cannot be nurtured. However, that`s exactly
what is happening in IVF clinics worldwide. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
is a technique used during the in vitro fertilization process to test for the
presence of certain inherited genetic disorders in human embryos. Disorders
currently detectable include cystic fibrosis, Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
disease. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis allows parents to request the
destruction of embryos with these disorders. Here, folks, is a diagnosis that
is more than quality control; it is a heinous brand of eugenics.
Indicative of the pit of evil and depravity our social elite has fallen into,
is the high praise given by mainstream media to IVF of Canada for offering
"genetic screening" of embryos. This clinic offers IVF for couples who are
actually able to conceive naturally, so their children can be tested for
diseases and disabilities before being implanted - in other words, so the
undesirable ones can be weeded out. Eureka! We can now design our children to
our own liking. Such wanton disregard for the dignity of human life is
scandalous. We`re obviously here way past the slippery slope - more like in an
ethical free-fall.
The Vatican proclaims unequivocally that in vitro fertilization is inherently
immoral as a way of creating life, because it denies the God-given right every
child has to be created within the context of a loving relationship between
mother and father. It also, of course, dehumanizes the child and treats her as
a product. The Pope further decries the existence of 24,000 frozen embryos in
Italy alone as "a veritable army of human beings in baths of liquid nitrogen."
He asks us to consider the plight of thousands of frozen embryos held captive
in appropriately called "concentration cans." As with him, the captivity of
these frozen embryos in "scientific" institutes all over the world should
instill great horror in anyone who recognizes that these embryos are as much
human persons as we ourselves are and bear the same incomparable dignity. They
are frozen embryos we must acknowledge as our brothers and sisters in mankind;
indeed, as our brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ.
Further shameful evidence of how far our commodification of human life in its
fragile beginning has progressed, is illustrated in a measure proposed last
February, by the New Jersey government, which would require doctors and other
medical professionals to have couples spell out in a legally binding document
what should happen to their embryos in the event they don't use them. The
options? They could donate them for scientific research, leave them to the
surviving spouse, donate them to another person or couple, or order them to be
destroyed!
As Knights, we must not shrink from our responsibility to educate the public
on the evil nature of in vitro fertilization and to impress upon IVF clinic
operators that God is God, and that they are not! Twenty-first-century society
stands at a moral crossroads. One fork could lead to eugenic chaos where what
is scientifically possible becomes morally acceptable; the other has visible
warning signs and prohibitions, the product of centuries of religious and
moral reflection. "Science has set before us decisions of immense
consequences," President Bush said. "We can pursue medical [wonders] with a
clear sense of moral purpose, or we can travel without an ethical compass into
a world we could live to regret."
Thaddée Renault
New Brunswick, Canada
September 10, 2003